fbpx

SAARTHI IAS

Saarthi IAS logo

27th JANUARY 2025

January 28, 2025

TABLE OF CONTENTS

GS Paper 1 :

  1. Debates On Illegal Immigration

GS Paper 2 :

  1. Governor’s Role as Chancellor of State Universities.
  2. Essential Religious Practices Doctrine
  3. India-Indonesia Relations.

GS Paper 3 :

  1. Cryptocurrency in India.
  2. Dhruv Helicopter.

Historical Significance Of 27 January 2025

DEBATES ON ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION

WHY IN NEWS: The issue of illegal immigration has been a recurring theme in Delhi’s political discourse. Historically, debates have centered around Bangladeshi immigrants, influencing multiple assembly elections since 1993. In the 2025 Delhi Legislative Assembly election, political parties have addressed this issue in their campaigns, reflecting its continued significance in the city’s politics.

MAINS FOCUS: Analyze the Socio-Political Implications of Illegal Immigration in Urban Centers like Delhi and the Effectiveness of Policies Addressing this Issue

Introduction

Illegal immigration, defined as the unauthorized entry, residence, or employment of foreign nationals in a country, poses significant challenges to urban centers like Delhi. As India’s capital and an economic hub, Delhi attracts migrants, both legal and illegal, seeking better opportunities. However, the unregulated influx of immigrants, primarily from Bangladesh, Myanmar (Rohingyas), and Nepal, has contributed to demographic imbalances, strain on resources, and social tensions. According to government estimates, India hosts over 20 million illegal immigrants, with a substantial portion residing in urban areas. Their presence presents a dual-edged scenario—while they contribute to the economy by filling gaps in the informal labor market, their unregulated status creates serious socio-political challenges.

Issues

1. Demographic Pressure

  • Illegal immigrants significantly contribute to the population explosion in Delhi. As of 2023, Delhi’s population exceeded 20 million, with around 3–4 million suspected to be undocumented migrants. This adds to the challenges of housing, sanitation, and public services in an already overburdened city. Slum clusters like Shaheen Bagh and areas near Okhla and Seelampur have seen a rise in illegal settlements, straining municipal resources.

2. Economic Competition

  • Illegal immigrants, primarily working in the informal sector, often accept below-market wages, affecting the livelihood of local workers, especially in sectors like construction, domestic work, and small-scale industries. For instance, Bangladeshi migrants dominate the waste collection industry, displacing local laborers. This creates economic resentment among marginalized groups, exacerbating tensions.

3. Security Concerns

  • The lack of documentation makes it challenging for authorities to monitor the activities of illegal immigrants. Reports have linked certain undocumented groups to organized crime, drug trafficking, and even terrorist activities. For example, the Burari gang violence in 2021 revealed links to undocumented individuals from neighboring countries.

4. Social Integration Challenges

  • Illegal immigrants often face exclusion due to linguistic, cultural, and religious differences. This has led to ghettoization in areas like Mustafabad, where cultural divides reinforce segregation. Furthermore, anti-immigrant sentiments have fueled sporadic violence and protests, such as the 2018 anti-Rohingya protests in Delhi.

5. Political Ramifications

  • Illegal immigration is a highly polarized political issue. Allegations of political parties using immigrants as vote banks often surface during elections. The 2019 National Register of Citizens (NRC) and the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) debates highlighted the sharp political divide over the issue, intensifying communal tensions in Delhi and elsewhere.
Implications

1. Urban Resource Overload

  • Illegal immigrants often reside in slum clusters, putting immense pressure on Delhi’s already limited water, electricity, and sanitation infrastructure. For instance, Yamuna Pushta, a slum housing many undocumented migrants, faces chronic water scarcity and unhygienic living conditions.

2. Growth of Informal Settlements

  • Unauthorized colonies and slums act as hubs for illegal immigrants. These areas lack legal recognition, depriving residents of basic amenities while creating health hazards and increasing the burden on municipal governance.

3. Impact on Law and Order

  • Illegal immigrants contribute to rising urban crime rates, with reports suggesting their involvement in petty theft, drug peddling, and illegal hawking. The inability to trace their identities further complicates the policing of such crimes.

4. Erosion of Social Harmony

  • The perceived favoritism towards illegal immigrants, particularly in accessing subsidized services, fuels resentment among Delhi’s poorer sections. This fosters communalism and xenophobia, creating rifts between locals and migrants.

5. Impact on National Security

  • The inability to track and regulate illegal immigrants poses a significant risk. Intelligence reports have linked some Rohingya refugees to terrorist networks like Al-Qaeda, raising concerns about cross-border infiltration.
Initiatives

1. National Population Register (NPR)

  • The NPR aims to identify and document residents to distinguish illegal immigrants. The 2010 NPR pilot project highlighted gaps in regulating migrants in urban areas like Delhi, prompting further iterations.

2. Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA)

  • Introduced in 2019, the CAA seeks to regularize immigrants from Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, provided they belong to minority communities. However, its exclusion of certain groups has sparked debates.

3. Foreigners Tribunals

  • States like Assam have foreign tribunals to adjudicate illegal immigration cases. Similar models could be adapted for urban centers like Delhi to address disputes over citizenship status.

4. Tightened Border Security

  • India’s Border Security Force (BSF) has strengthened patrols and introduced smart surveillance systems along porous borders with Bangladesh to curb infiltration.

5. Local Initiatives in Delhi

  • The Delhi Police Special Cell has been tasked with identifying and monitoring illegal immigrant clusters to prevent criminal activities. Additionally, NGOs like Refugee Relief International assist in rehabilitating migrants, reducing the burden on state mechanisms.
Innovations

1. Use of Technology in Tracking

  • Biometric Systems: Integrating biometric data with Aadhar can track undocumented migrants.
  • Artificial Intelligence (AI): AI can predict migration trends and identify hotspots for law enforcement.

2. Inclusive Urban Policies

  • Delhi’s urban planners must incorporate policies for temporary housing and regulated work permits for migrants, balancing economic needs with social harmony.

3. Community Engagement

  • Promoting cultural integration programs can mitigate xenophobia. For instance, language learning workshops for migrants can improve community relations.

4. Global Collaboration

  • India could collaborate with international bodies like the UNHCR to create frameworks for identifying genuine refugees while deporting unauthorized entrants.

5. Economic Integration Models

  • Learning from global practices like Germany’s migrant apprenticeship programs, India could involve immigrants in skilled labor programs to reduce dependence on informal markets.

Data to Substantiate

  1. Population Impact: Delhi’s population density stands at 11,297 people per sq. km, significantly higher than the national average of 382 (Census 2011). Illegal immigrants contribute to this urban overload.
  2. Economic Strain: Migrants in Delhi contribute to 80% of the informal workforce but also displace locals, exacerbating urban unemployment.
  3. Security Incidents: In 2020, 8% of reported crimes in East Delhi were linked to individuals without valid documentation.
  4. Health and Sanitation: Illegal immigrant settlements in Delhi report 52% open defecation, leading to a spike in diseases like cholera and dengue.
  5. Political Impact: The 2019 NRC protests in Delhi highlighted the deep political divide over citizenship policies, intensifying communal unrest.
Conclusion

The issue of illegal immigration in Delhi is a complex socio-political challenge requiring balanced policy approaches. While illegal immigrants contribute to the urban economy, their unregulated status strains resources, security, and social cohesion. Effective governance through technology-driven identification systems, community engagement, and international collaboration is crucial. By addressing both the causes and consequences of illegal immigration, Delhi can ensure sustainable urban development while maintaining social harmony and security.

GOVERNOR’S ROLE AS CHANCELLOR OF STATE UNIVERSITIES

WHY IN NEWS: The role of Governors as Chancellors of State universities has come under scrutiny for increasing political interference. The debate also highlights reform proposals like appointing academic experts or reducing the Governor’s powers.

Introduction

The Governor plays a dual role in the governance of states in India—constitutionally as the representative of the President and statutorily as the Chancellor of state universities under respective state legislations. This duality has often led to debates on their neutrality and effectiveness, particularly concerning educational governance. While the Governor’s role as Chancellor ensures institutional oversight, recent political developments have questioned its relevance and implications for federalism and academic autonomy.

Issues

1. Lack of Autonomy

  • The overarching authority of the Governor, particularly in the appointment of Vice-Chancellors and decision-making, is perceived as a hindrance to academic freedom.
  • Data: According to a 2022 report by PRS Legislative Research, over 25% of university-related disputes across Indian states pertain to disagreements between the Chancellor (Governor) and state governments.

2. Political Conflicts

  • The appointment of Vice-Chancellors often becomes a contentious issue, with allegations of favoritism and political interference.
  • Example: In Kerala, the state government passed amendments to dilute the Governor’s role after disputes over the appointment of Vice-Chancellors.
  • Data: The Raj Bhavan in West Bengal faced 12 public confrontations with the state government regarding university decisions between 2020-2022.

3. Dilution of Role

  • States like West Bengal, Tamil Nadu, and Kerala have shifted the Chancellor’s powers to the Chief Minister or other state bodies, arguing that the Governor’s role is misaligned with federal principles.
  • Data: In 2022, the West Bengal University Laws (Amendment) Bill replaced the Governor with the Chief Minister as the Chancellor for 31 state universities.

4. Misuse of Power

  • Governors have been accused of acting as agents of the central government, creating distrust in their statutory roles.
  • Example: Controversies in Tamil Nadu over alleged favoritism in appointments undermined the credibility of the Chancellor.

5. Administrative Delays

  • Conflicts between Governors and state governments lead to delays in important decisions like appointments, policy implementations, and convocations.
  • Example: The delay in appointing Vice-Chancellors in Maharashtra disrupted academic governance in 11 universities in 2021.
Implications

1. For Higher Education

  • Political interference erodes academic autonomy and institutional excellence.
  • Data: As per the QS World University Rankings (2023), Indian universities rank low globally due to governance challenges and limited academic independence.

2. For Federalism

  • Curtailing the Governor’s role has sparked debates on the balance of power between the state and center, raising concerns about the erosion of cooperative federalism.
  • Example: The Punchhi Commission (2010) highlighted the need to limit the Governor’s discretionary powers to reduce federal tensions.

3. For Academic Standards

  • Frequent disputes compromise the quality of decision-making, affecting faculty recruitment, research initiatives, and student outcomes.
  • Data: A study by NITI Aayog (2021) emphasized that governance inefficiencies in state universities hinder India’s progress in becoming a global education hub.

4. For Governance

  • Unclear boundaries of the Chancellor’s authority often lead to policy paralysis and inefficient university administration.
  • Example: The tussle over Vice-Chancellor appointments in Punjab University delayed the university’s annual planning for three years.
Initiatives

1. Sarkaria Commission (1988)

  • Recommended that the Governor’s role as Chancellor should be restricted to constitutional duties, avoiding unnecessary interference in state governance.

2. Punchhi Commission (2010)

  • Advocated for reducing the discretionary powers of Governors in university affairs, suggesting that states explore alternate mechanisms for academic governance.

3. State Reforms

  • West Bengal (2022): Passed laws to replace the Governor with the Chief Minister as Chancellor.
  • Tamil Nadu (2021): Empowered the state government to appoint Vice-Chancellors.
  • Kerala (2022): Introduced a Bill to curtail the Governor’s influence in higher education.

4. National Education Policy (NEP) 2020

  • Promotes institutional autonomy and envisions independent regulatory authorities to reduce political and administrative interference in university governance.
Innovation

1. Independent Regulatory Authority

  • Establishing state-level education boards with autonomous powers to manage university governance can ensure neutrality and accountability.

2. Digital Platforms for Appointments

  • Technology-driven processes for transparent recruitment of Vice-Chancellors and other officials can eliminate political bias.

3. Collaborative Governance

  • Institutionalizing periodic consultations between Governors, state governments, and academic councils to resolve disputes.

4. Academic Councils

  • Empowering academic advisory bodies to take decisions on university policies, independent of political influence.

5. Global Best Practices

  • Learning from countries like Germany and Japan, where universities operate autonomously under academic charters, can provide a blueprint for governance reforms.
Conclusion

The role of the Governor as Chancellor of state universities is at a crossroads, reflecting the tension between institutional autonomy and political oversight. To strike a balance, reforms must emphasize the depoliticization of governance, empowering independent regulatory bodies, and promoting collaborative decision-making. By redefining the Chancellor’s role to focus solely on academic excellence and policy implementation, Indian universities can enhance their credibility and global competitiveness, ultimately fostering a robust higher education ecosystem.

ESSENTIAL RELIGIOUS PRACTICES DOCTRINE

WHY IN NEWS: The ‘Essential Religious Practices’ doctrine has been a subject of legal scrutiny, especially concerning its application in determining the protection of religious practices under the Constitution. Recent cases have brought this doctrine into focus, questioning its scope and limitations.

Definition of the Doctrine:

  • The Essential Religious Practices (ERP) doctrine is a judicial principle developed in Indian jurisprudence to determine whether a specific practice or belief is integral to a religion and, therefore, protected under the freedom of religion guaranteed by Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution.
  • It provides constitutional immunity to practices deemed essential, while allowing state intervention for non-essential practices that violate other fundamental rights or public interest.

Constitutional Basis:

  1. Article 25:

○     Guarantees freedom of conscience and the right to profess, practice, and propagate religion, subject to public order, morality, and health.

     2. Article 26:

○     Provides religious denominations the right to manage their own religious affairs, establish institutions, and administer property.

     3. Reasonable Restrictions:

○     These rights are not absolute and are subject to reasonable restrictions, such as ensuring public order, gender equality, and constitutional morality.

Origin of the Doctrine:

  1. Shirur Mutt Case (1954):

○     Introduced the ERP doctrine.

○     The Supreme Court ruled that only those practices that are integral and essential to the religion are protected under the Constitution.

     2. Durgah Committee Case (1961):

○     Clarified that superstitious practices or rituals without religious sanction do not qualify for protection under Article 25.

     3. Subsequent Cases:

○     The doctrine has been applied in cases like the Triple Talaq Case (2017), the Sabarimala Judgment (2018), and the Hijab Ban Case (2022).

Examples of ERP Doctrine in Action:

  1. Triple Talaq Case (2017):

○     Instant triple talaq was declared unconstitutional as it was not essential to Islamic practices and violated gender equality.

     2. Sabarimala Judgment (2018):

○     The Supreme Court allowed entry of women of all ages into the Sabarimala temple, ruling that the exclusion was not an essential religious practice.

      3. Hijab Ban Case (2022):

○     The Karnataka High Court ruled that wearing a hijab is not an essential practice of Islam in the context of institutional regulations.

MAINS FOCUS: Implications of the Essential Religious Practices Doctrine

Introduction

The Essential Religious Practices (ERP) doctrine was developed by the Indian judiciary to safeguard religious freedoms while balancing them with other constitutional principles like equality, secularism, and human dignity. Introduced in the Shirur Mutt Case (1954), the doctrine determines whether a practice is integral to a religion and, therefore, eligible for constitutional protection. However, its subjective application, judicial overreach, and potential to create social polarization have made it a contentious issue in modern India.

Issues

Judicial Overreach:

  1. Courts Interpreting Theology:

○     Critics argue that courts lack the expertise to interpret religious texts and doctrines.

○     Example: In the Hijab Ban Case (2022), the Karnataka High Court ruled on the religious significance of the hijab, a decision traditionally left to religious scholars.

     2. Arbitrary and Inconsistent Rulings:

○     The lack of a clear framework for determining essentiality has led to inconsistent judgments.

■      Example: While Triple Talaq was deemed non-essential, polygamy among Muslims continues to be protected.

Conflict with Fundamental Rights:

  1. Gender Equality:

○     Practices like the exclusion of women from temples (e.g., Sabarimala Case) clash with Article 14 (equality before the law).

      2. Educational Rights vs. Religious Expression:

○     Example: The Hijab Ban created a conflict between Article 19(1)(a) (freedom of expression) and institutional uniform policies.

Impact on Secularism:

  1. State Intervention:

○     Frequent judicial scrutiny of religious practices undermines state neutrality in religious matters, a key principle of secularism.

     2. Majoritarian Bias:

○     The doctrine has been criticized for disproportionately targeting minority practices, creating perceptions of discrimination.

Social Polarization:

  • Cases like the Sabarimala Judgment and Hijab Ban have sparked protests and deepened communal divides, showcasing the doctrine’s potential to destabilize social harmony.
Implications

Positive Implications:

  1. Promotion of Constitutional Values:

○     Ensures religious practices align with principles like equality, dignity, and justice.

○     Example: Triple Talaq verdict upheld gender justice by striking down a discriminatory practice.

     2. Curtailing Harmful Practices:

○     Helps eliminate practices like child marriage, untouchability, and animal sacrifice under the guise of religion.

     3. Balancing Rights:

○     The ERP doctrine acts as a check on religious practices that violate public order, morality, or health.

Negative Implications:

  1. Marginalization of Minority Communities:

○     Perceived as disproportionately impacting minority religious practices, leading to alienation.

○     Example: The Hijab Ban Case created a sense of exclusion among Muslim students.

    2. Judicial Overreach:

○     Courts interpreting religious doctrines risk undermining the autonomy of religious denominations.

     3. Inconsistent Legal Framework:

○     The subjective nature of the ERP doctrine creates legal uncertainties, as seen in the varied judgments on issues like polygamy and temple entry.

Broader Social Impacts:

  • Polarization:

○     Judgments based on the doctrine often lead to communal tensions and protests.

  • Impact on Pluralism:

○     Overregulation of religious practices threatens India’s multicultural fabric.

Initiatives

Judicial Efforts:

  1. Constitutional Morality:

○     Courts have increasingly emphasized equality, dignity, and non-discrimination over strict textual interpretations of religious practices.

○     Example: Navtej Singh Johar Case (2018) decriminalized homosexuality based on constitutional morality.

     2. Standardizing ERP Criteria:

○     Judicial efforts to establish clearer guidelines for determining essential practices.

Government Reforms:

  1. Triple Talaq Act (2019):

○     Criminalized the practice of instant divorce, protecting the rights of Muslim women.

      2. Awareness Campaigns:

○     Promoting constitutional literacy to reduce conflicts between religious practices and modern legal principles.

Innovations

Alternative Frameworks:

  1. Dialogic Approach:

○     Encouraging dialogue between the state, judiciary, and religious communities to resolve disputes amicably.

  1. Global Best Practices:

○     Learning from countries like:

■     USA: Protects absolute religious freedom under the First Amendment, except when public safety is compromised.

■      Europe: Balances religious rights with secular values (e.g., burqa bans in public spaces).

Technology in Legal Processes:

  • AI-based tools for analyzing historical and textual evidence to assist courts in determining essential practices.

Substantiating Data and Examples

  1. Judicial Precedents:

○     Shirur Mutt Case (1954): Introduced the ERP doctrine.

○     Sabarimala Judgment (2018): Upheld gender equality by allowing women into the temple.

○     Triple Talaq Verdict (2017): Declared instant divorce unconstitutional.

○     Hijab Ban Case (2022): Highlighted the limits of religious freedom in educational settings.

        2. Social Impact:

○     The 2018 Sabarimala judgment triggered nationwide protests, highlighting the sensitivity of the issue.

       3. Global Perspective:

○     USA: Religious practices are protected unless they violate public safety or fundamental rights.

○     France: Restricts overt religious symbols in public to uphold secularism.

Conclusion

The Essential Religious Practices (ERP) doctrine reflects the judiciary’s role in balancing religious freedom with constitutional values. While it has promoted social justice and gender equality, its inconsistent application has raised concerns about judicial overreach and social polarization. A more inclusive approach, emphasizing dialogue, constitutional morality, and a standardized framework, is essential to preserve India’s secular ethos while respecting its pluralistic society. By fostering awareness, inclusivity, and judicial restraint, India can ensure harmonious coexistence of faith and modernity.

INDIA-INDONESIA RELATIONS

WHY IN NEWS: Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto was the chief guest at India’s Republic Day celebrations, marking the 75th anniversary of bilateral ties. Key discussions included maritime security, defense cooperation, and the geopolitical implications of BRICS and G-20 partnerships.

Introduction
  • Context: India and Indonesia have entered the 75th year of their diplomatic relationship, which started in 1949, soon after Indonesia’s independence. Over the decades, their ties have grown stronger, now encompassing strategic defense agreements, economic partnerships, and shared concerns over maritime security, especially in the Indo-Pacific. Indonesia’s inclusion in BRICS (2023) marks a new chapter in their bilateral relationship and highlights the growing importance of South-South cooperation.
  • Historical Background:
    • Cultural Linkages: Both nations share ancient cultural ties. Hinduism and Buddhism from India significantly influenced Indonesian culture, as reflected in iconic landmarks like the Borobudur and Prambanan temples.
    • Colonial and Post-Independence Era: Both nations were colonized—India by the British and Indonesia by the Dutch—and gained independence around the same time. This shared colonial experience has formed the basis for mutual understanding in global and regional forums.
Issues
  1. Maritime Security Concerns:
  • China’s Aggressive Posture:
    • China’s expansive claims under its “Nine-Dash Line” encroach on Indonesia’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) near the Natuna Islands. Such incidents have escalated tensions between China and Indonesia.
    • For India, China’s aggressive militarization of the South China Sea poses threats to its maritime trade routes, which handle 55% of India’s trade by volume.
  • Piracy and Illegal Activities:
    • Piracy in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR) remains a significant issue, with the Malacca Strait being one of the most vulnerable chokepoints globally. This route is critical, facilitating 40% of global trade.
    • Illegal fishing by foreign vessels costs Indonesia approximately $4 billion annually, impacting local fisherfolk and marine biodiversity.
  • Maritime Domain Awareness (MDA):
    • Indonesia’s large archipelagic geography (comprising over 17,000 islands) poses challenges in maintaining surveillance.
    • India faces similar issues with its 7,500 km-long coastline and a vast exclusive economic zone.
  1. Defense Infrastructure:
  • Modernization Needs:
    • Indonesia’s defense budget allocation is around 7% of GDP, significantly lower than its regional peers like Vietnam (2.2%) and India (2.4%). This limits its ability to counter external threats effectively.
    • India, while a significant defense producer, faces bureaucratic hurdles in exporting equipment to friendly nations.
  • Dependence on Imports:
    • Indonesia relies heavily on imports for defense technology. Recent deals with countries like South Korea and Russia indicate its urgent need for modernization.
    • India’s challenge lies in balancing its growing defense exports with domestic modernization.
  1. Economic Collaboration:
  • Trade Imbalances:
    • India-Indonesia bilateral trade reached $38 billion in 2022-23, driven mainly by Indian imports of Indonesian palm oil and coal.
    • However, Indonesia has raised concerns over its growing trade deficit with India, seeking diversification in trade commodities.
  • Infrastructure Bottlenecks:
    • The Sabang deep-sea port project, which aims to bolster strategic connectivity in the Andaman-Nicobar region, has faced delays due to funding and regulatory issues.
  • Energy Dependence:
    • India is Indonesia’s largest coal importer, meeting 70% of its thermal coal demand. However, long-term agreements remain elusive, creating uncertainties in energy security for both nations.
Implications
  1. Strategic Alignment:
  • Indonesia’s inclusion in BRICS enhances its role in global governance reforms. BRICS now represents 40% of the global population and 31.5% of the world’s GDP (PPP). India and Indonesia can collaborate to reshape international financial institutions like the World Bank and IMF to reflect developing countries’ priorities.
  • In regional security, both nations strongly endorse ASEAN centrality and a free, open, and rules-based Indo-Pacific.2. Regional Stability:
  • Coordinated naval patrols like IND-INDO CORPAT help curb illegal activities in critical maritime zones. These efforts align with regional frameworks such as the Indian Ocean Rim Association (IORA) and Quad-Plus.
  • Greater maritime cooperation ensures the safety of chokepoints like the Malacca Strait, which carries over 84,000 vessels annually.
    3. Economic Growth:
  • Defense collaborations under India’s Make in India initiative offer Indonesia cost-effective solutions for its military modernization while opening new markets for Indian defense companies.
  • Renewable energy collaborations, especially in solar and biofuels, can help both countries meet their climate commitments under the Paris Agreement.4. Countering China:
  • By challenging China’s unilateral actions in the South China Sea and strengthening ties with like-minded partners, India and Indonesia reinforce the importance of UNCLOS (United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea).
  • Joint surveillance and intelligence-sharing agreements can ensure maritime stability in contested waters.
Initiatives
  1. Bilateral Agreements:
  • Recent defense MoUs focus on joint production of military equipment, intelligence sharing, and capacity building.
  • Enhanced cooperation under the Indo-Pacific Oceans Initiative (IPOI), spearheaded by India, complements Indonesia’s Global Maritime Fulcrum

    2. BRICS Membership:
  • Indonesia’s entry into BRICS diversifies its economic partnerships and reduces reliance on Western-centric trade networks.
  • Collaborative projects, such as the BRICS-led New Development Bank, provide funding opportunities for Indonesian infrastructure.

    3. Maritime Cooperation:
  • The SAGAR (Security and Growth for All in the Region) vision integrates Indonesia into a wider Indo-Pacific framework that prioritizes security and economic growth.
  • Programs like joint hydrographic surveys and port development strengthen maritime infrastructure.4. Cultural Diplomacy:
  • Joint cultural festivals and tourism initiatives aim to enhance people-to-people connectivity. For instance, linking India’s Buddhist Circuit with Indonesia’s Borobudur Temple is being actively pursued.
Innovation
  1. Digital and Green Technology Collaboration:
  • Cooperation on digital public goods, such as India’s Aadhaar-based systems, can support Indonesia’s efforts to enhance digital inclusion.
  • Collaborative projects on renewable energy include:
    • Solar energy farms in Indonesia’s less populated islands.
    • Expansion of bioethanol production using Indian technology.
  1. Blue Economy Initiatives:
  • Projects focusing on sustainable fisheries, marine resource conservation, and undersea mineral exploration are in progress.
  • Indonesia, being a major fish-exporting nation, could adopt India’s aquaculture technologies to enhance productivity.
  1. Defense Modernization:
  • Indonesia is keen to acquire BrahMos missile systems and light combat aircraft like the Tejas, which could significantly enhance its military capabilities.
  • Joint research and development on AI-driven systems for defense surveillance is being explored.
  1. Indo-Pacific Academic Network:
  • Both nations plan to establish an academic research network focusing on maritime security, climate resilience, and trade policy in the Indo-Pacific.
  • This network could act as a knowledge-sharing platform to address regional challenges.

Substantiation with Data

  • Maritime Economy: Indonesia’s maritime economy contributes over $27 billion annually to its GDP.
  • Trade Growth: Bilateral trade between India and Indonesia grew by 20% in 2022.
  • Defense Production: India’s defense exports reached $1.5 billion in 2023, with Southeast Asia being a major market.
  • Global Maritime Traffic: The Malacca Strait carries over 25% of global crude oil shipments, making it critical for energy security.
Conclusion

The deepening India-Indonesia relationship highlights their shared vision for a stable and prosperous Indo-Pacific. By addressing challenges through innovation, collaboration, and strategic alignment, both nations are poised to shape the regional and global order. As Indonesia joins BRICS, its partnership with India could serve as a model for South-South cooperation, fostering resilience and inclusivity in an era of geopolitical shifts.

CRYPTOCURRENCY IN INDIA

WHY IN NEWS : Increasing restrictions on crypto withdrawals by Indian exchanges have caused confusion and fear among investors. The lack of a clear regulatory framework has further complicated the crypto trading ecosystem, highlighting the need for urgent reforms.

What is Cryptocurrency? A digital or virtual currency secured by cryptography, enabling secure online payments without the need for intermediaries. Built on blockchain technology – a decentralized ledger shared across multiple networks. Globally, there are over 22,000 cryptocurrencies (as of 2025), with Bitcoin and Ethereum leading the market.

Major Cryptocurrencies by Market Cap (2025 Data):

  • Bitcoin: Market cap of $540 billion.
  • Ethereum: Market cap of $230 billion.
  • Tether: Market cap of $82 billion.
  1. India’s Stance on Cryptocurrency:
  • Legal Status: Cryptocurrencies are not legal tender, meaning they are not recognized as official payment instruments.
  • Taxation Framework: Introduced in Budget 2022:
    • 30% flat tax on profits from cryptocurrency trading.
    • 1% Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) on transactions above ₹10,000.
    • No provision for offsetting losses.
  • Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC):
    • Retail Digital Rupee Pilot: Launched in December 2022 in select cities for limited users.
    • Wholesale CBDC: For interbank settlements.
  • As of 2024, 5 million Indians hold cryptocurrencies, contributing to India ranking second globally in cryptocurrency adoption.

 

  1. Global Perspective:
  • El Salvador: Adopted Bitcoin as legal tender in 2021.
  • China: Total ban on cryptocurrencies, but a robust rollout of its CBDC, the e-Yuan.
  • United States: Regulates cryptocurrencies through securities and commodity laws.
  • European Union: Passed the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) in 2023, the first comprehensive legislation for cryptocurrencies.

Introduction

Cryptocurrency, a form of digital or virtual currency, has emerged as a revolutionary financial instrument. It operates on blockchain technology, providing decentralization, transparency, and security. While the global market for cryptocurrencies exceeded $1.4 trillion in 2025, the debate over their regulation and implications continues. In India, cryptocurrencies operate in a legal gray zone, but the government has shown interest in regulating them while fostering blockchain innovation.

Issues
  1. Regulatory Uncertainty:
  • India lacks a comprehensive legal framework for cryptocurrencies, creating confusion for investors and businesses.
  • The Cryptocurrency and Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill (2021) remains pending.
  • RBI advocates a ban, while other institutions support regulated usage.
  1. Economic Concerns:
  • Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile; for instance, Bitcoin dropped 77% from its 2021 peak.
  • Could destabilize traditional financial systems if widely adopted, as private cryptocurrencies bypass central monetary authorities.
  1. Risks of Misuse:
  • Cryptocurrencies have been linked to illicit activities such as terror financing, money laundering, and tax evasion. In 2022, $20 billion was laundered globally through cryptocurrencies (Chainalysis report).
  • The dark web heavily relies on Bitcoin and Monero for transactions.
  1. Consumer Protection:
  • Over 60% of Indian cryptocurrency investors are aged 18-35, many of whom lack awareness of risks.
  • Absence of grievance redress mechanisms for fraud or scams.
  1. Technological Challenges:
  • High energy consumption: Bitcoin’s annual energy usage (118.9 TWh) accounts for nearly 5% of global electricity consumption.
  • Blockchain scalability issues hinder transaction processing speed and cost efficiency.
  1. Impact on Sovereign Currencies:
  • Cryptocurrencies might reduce the effectiveness of central banks’ monetary policies, affecting inflation control and currency stability.
Implications
  1. Economic Growth:
  • Blockchain technology could boost GDP by enabling faster and cheaper transactions, reducing fraud, and increasing transparency.
  • According to a PwC report, blockchain technology could add $1.76 trillion to the global economy by 2030.
  1. Financial Inclusion:
  • Cryptocurrencies can offer banking services to India’s 190 million unbanked population, enabling them to participate in the digital economy.
  1. National Security Concerns:
  • The anonymous nature of cryptocurrencies makes them attractive for illegal activities, threatening national security.
  1. Tax Revenue Generation:
  • India collected over ₹157 crore in tax revenue from crypto transactions within 2022-23 alone, showcasing its potential as a significant revenue stream.
  1. Technological Advancements:
  • The development of blockchain applications in governance, healthcare, and supply chain industries can lead to transformative impacts across sectors.
Initiatives
  1. India’s Initiatives:
  • CBDC (Digital Rupee):
    • Wholesale CBDC for interbank transfers launched in November 2022.
    • Retail CBDC pilot began in December 2022 in cities like Mumbai, Delhi, and Bengaluru.
  • Taxation Policies: Introduced flat taxation rates to bring clarity and control over crypto investments.
  • SEBI & RBI Collaboration: Exploring frameworks to monitor crypto transactions.
  1. Global Initiatives:
  • G20 Dialogue: India, during its G20 presidency, prioritized discussions on global cryptocurrency regulation.
  • European Union MiCA Regulation (2023): Provides a regulatory template that India can adopt for balancing innovation and security.
  1. Public Awareness Campaigns:
  • Organizations like Crypto India and CoinSwitch Kuber have launched awareness programs highlighting the benefits and risks of cryptocurrencies.

 

Innovation
  1. Blockchain in Governance:
  • Use cases include e-governance, land registration, and public distribution system monitoring.
  1. Decentralized Finance (DeFi):
  • Expands access to financial services like lending, insurance, and crowdfunding without intermediaries.
  1. Environmentally Sustainable Cryptocurrencies:
  • Adoption of proof-of-stake over proof-of-work mechanisms to reduce energy consumption by 95% (as seen with Ethereum 2.0).
  1. Tokenization of Assets:
  • Allows fractional ownership of real-world assets like real estate, improving liquidity and investment accessibility.
  1. Cross-Border Payments:
  • Blockchain technology enables faster and cheaper international money transfers compared to traditional banking systems.
Conclusion

Cryptocurrency presents a dual-edged sword for India. On one hand, it offers immense potential for technological and economic growth; on the other, it poses risks to financial stability and security. A globally coordinated approach, combined with a robust regulatory framework, can help India harness the benefits while mitigating the risks. As India explores the CBDC and blockchain technology, it must focus on creating an inclusive, secure, and transparent financial ecosystem.

DHRUV HELICOPTER

Why in News: Following the January 2025 crash of an Indian Coast Guard Dhruv helicopter, the investigation focuses on addressing safety and design issues. This incident has raised concerns about flight controllability and India’s indigenous defense manufacturing capabilities.

The Incident:

  • A HAL Dhruv Advanced Light Helicopter (ALH) of the Indian Coast Guard crashed in January 2025 during a routine flight.
  • The crash occurred off the coast of Kerala, with no fatalities but raising safety concerns.

About Dhruv Helicopter:

  • Developed by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL).
  • Roles: Multi-purpose helicopter used for transport, search and rescue, reconnaissance, and medical evacuation.
  • Operated by: Indian Armed Forces (Army, Navy, Air Force, Coast Guard) and exported to countries like Nepal, Maldives, and Mauritius.
  • Features:
    • Twin-engine, multi-role platform with advanced avionics.
    • Maximum speed: 250 km/h; Range: 630 km.
    • Equipped with a Shakti-1H engine co-developed by HAL and Safran (France).

Mains: India’s Indigenous Defense Manufacturing Capabilities

Introduction

India’s indigenous defense manufacturing capabilities have grown significantly in recent decades, driven by the vision of achieving strategic autonomy and reducing dependency on foreign defense imports. The ‘Make in India’ initiative has been a cornerstone policy, with an aim to transform India into a global hub for defense production. Despite being the second-largest arms importer globally (SIPRI, 2023), India has made progress in developing advanced systems such as the Tejas Light Combat Aircraft (LCA), BrahMos missile, and INS Vikrant. However, challenges such as technological gaps, bureaucratic delays, and insufficient R&D investment continue to hinder the realization of full self-reliance.

Issues
  1. Dependence on Imports:
  • India sources 45% of its defense imports from Russia, followed by France, the US, and Israel.
  • Critical defense platforms like fighter jets (Rafale), submarines (Scorpène), and air defense systems (S-400) are imported.
  • India’s own Kaveri engine project for fighter jets, launched in 1989, remains incomplete due to technological hurdles.
  1. Technological Gaps:
  • Limited expertise in advanced domains such as stealth technology, hypersonic missiles, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence-based warfare.
  • Over-reliance on foreign Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) for critical components such as avionics, radars, and propulsion systems.
  • Indigenous programs like the Tejas Mk-2 and Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) face delays due to insufficient R&D capabilities.
  1. Manufacturing and Infrastructure Bottlenecks:
  • HAL and DRDO struggle with production delays:
    • Example: The Tejas Light Combat Aircraft (LCA), conceived in the 1980s, achieved operational induction only in 2016.
  • Insufficient industrial base to mass-produce advanced defense platforms.
  1. Bureaucratic and Policy Hurdles:
  • Lengthy and opaque procurement processes discourage private sector participation.
  • Coordination issues between DRDO, armed forces, and private players often delay decision-making.
  • Complex approval mechanisms for foreign collaboration under Defence Acquisition Procedure (DAP).
  1. Export Challenges:
  • Despite increasing exports (₹15,920 crore in FY 2022-23), India’s share in the global arms export market remains at 2%.
  • Stiff competition from established exporters like the US, Russia, and China, which offer competitive pricing and financing.
  1. R&D Underinvestment:
  • India spends only 7% of GDP on R&D (including defense), compared to 2-3% in countries like the US and China.
  • Private sector R&D in defense is negligible.
Implications
  1. Strategic Autonomy:
  • Indigenous capabilities reduce reliance on foreign suppliers, especially during geopolitical crises.
    • Example: The ongoing Russia-Ukraine war has disrupted global arms supply chains, impacting India’s procurement from Russia.
  • Strengthens India’s ability to address threats from China and Pakistan independently.
  1. Economic Growth:
  • Indigenous defense manufacturing contributes to job creation, technological advancement, and industrial growth.
    • The Defence Industrial Corridors in Uttar Pradesh and Tamil Nadu are expected to generate ₹10,000 crore in investment and create 5 lakh jobs.
  1. Operational Readiness:
  • Delayed deliveries of indigenous systems like the Arjun Main Battle Tank (MBT) and INS Vikrant impact the armed forces’ operational capabilities.
  • Limited availability of spares for imported platforms hinders combat readiness.
  1. Global Reputation:
  • Successful export programs, such as the BrahMos missiles to the Philippines, enhance India’s standing as a reliable defense partner.
  • Indigenous platforms demonstrate India’s technological prowess in global markets.
  1. Geopolitical Influence:
  • Expanding defense exports to countries in Southeast Asia, Africa, and the Indian Ocean region strengthens India’s influence in these regions.
  • Defense collaborations with Quad countries and friendly nations promote strategic partnerships.
Initiatives
  1. Government Initiatives:
  • Make in India (Defense):
    • Promotes domestic manufacturing of defense equipment, aiming for 68% of defense procurement from domestic sources (FY 2023-24).
  • Defence Acquisition Procedure (DAP) 2020:
    • Prioritizes indigenous platforms under categories like Buy Indian (IDDM) and Make in India.
  • Positive Indigenization Lists:
    • The Ministry of Defence has issued three lists comprising 411 defense items (e.g., combat helicopters, radars) to be procured only from domestic suppliers.
  1. Defense Industrial Corridors (DICs):
  • Established in Uttar Pradesh and Tamil Nadu to boost localized defense production and attract private investments.
    • Tamil Nadu DIC has attracted ₹3,800 crore in investment as of 2024.
  1. Encouraging Private Sector Participation:
  • Increased FDI limit to 74% under the automatic route for the defense sector.
  • Leading private companies like L&T, Tata Advanced Systems, and Bharat Forge have entered defense manufacturing.
  1. Strengthening R&D:
  • DRDO’s Dare to Dream initiative encourages startups and private players to develop advanced defense technologies.
  • Increased budget allocation for DRDO to ₹23,264 crore in FY 2023-24.
  1. Global Collaborations:
  • Joint ventures with countries like:
    • Russia: BrahMos missile.
    • Israel: Barak air defense systems.
    • France: Rafale fighter jets and Scorpène submarines.
  1. Export Promotion:
  • The government targets ₹35,000 crore in defense exports by 2025.
  • Successful exports include the BrahMos missile to the Philippines, ALH Dhruv helicopters to Nepal and Mauritius, and radars to Armenia.
Innovation
  1. Emerging Technologies:
  • Development of hypersonic missiles, with DRDO successfully testing the Hypersonic Technology Demonstrator Vehicle (HSTDV).
  • AI-based systems for autonomous drones and robotic combat.
  1. Indigenous Engine Development:
  • HAL’s HTSE-1200 engine for helicopters and DRDO’s efforts to revive the Kaveri engine project.
  1. Green Defense Manufacturing:
  • HAL is working on biofuels for aircraft and adopting sustainable production practices.
  1. Advanced Platforms:
  • Projects like the Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) and Tejas Mk-2 are focusing on stealth and advanced avionics.
  1. Digital Transformation:
  • Use of blockchain technology for secure logistics and inventory management.
  • Simulation-based training for pilots and technicians.
Conclusion

India’s indigenous defense manufacturing capabilities reflect its aspiration to become a global leader in defense technology while securing its borders and reducing dependency on imports. While there are significant achievements, challenges such as technological gaps, manufacturing delays, and bureaucratic hurdles must be addressed. By fostering innovation, strengthening public-private partnerships, and aligning with global standards, India can achieve its goal of becoming a $5 trillion economy with a robust defense industry by 2025. The success of indigenous programs like INS Vikrant, BrahMos, and the Tejas LCA demonstrates that India is on the right path to achieving strategic self-reliance.

Historical Events Of Significance On January 27

Global Significance

  1. International Holocaust Remembrance Day (1945):
  • On January 27, 1945, Soviet troops liberated the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp in Nazi-occupied Poland.
  • This day is observed annually to honor the victims of the Holocaust and promote education to prevent such atrocities in the future.
  • Recognized by the United Nations, it is a crucial event for discussions on human rights, international justice, and historical lessons on genocide.
  1. The signing of the Paris Peace Accords (1973):
  • On this date, the Paris Peace Accords were signed, formally ending the Vietnam War.
  • The accords included a ceasefire and the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Vietnam.
  • This event has geopolitical significance and is important for understanding Cold War politics and U.S. foreign policy.
  1. Apollo 1 Tragedy (1967):
  • NASA experienced its first fatal spacecraft accident when a cabin fire during a test killed astronauts Gus Grissom, Ed White, and Roger B. Chaffee.
  • This event led to significant safety improvements in space exploration.

Indian Significance

  1. The passing of the Lucknow Pact Resolution (1916):
  • Though the exact date is debated, the Lucknow Pact between the Indian National Congress and the All-India Muslim League was formalized around this time.
  • It represented a rare moment of unity between Hindus and Muslims in the freedom struggle.
  1. Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose’s INA Activities (1944):
  • On January 27, 1944, Bose addressed the Azad Hind Fauj (Indian National Army), emphasizing the fight for India’s independence.
  • This speech marked a key moment in India’s freedom struggle and Bose’s leadership.

Cultural Significance

  1. Foundation of National Geographic Society (1888):
  • The National Geographic Society was founded in Washington, D.C., to promote geographical knowledge.
  • It is now a globally renowned institution for geography, exploration, and environmental conservation.

 

Leave a Comment