Strategy for Ethics (GS Paper - 4)
Maximum marks: 250
Introduction
GS Paper-4, Ethics, Integrity, and Aptitude, was introduced as part of reforms to the mains curriculum for the 2013 civil services examination.
The official UPSC course outline provides broad guidelines for what UPSC intends to test in this paper. It is stated that "This paper will test the candidate's attitude and approach to issues relating to integrity, probity in public life, and his problem-solving approach to various issues and conflicts he faces in dealing with society." These aspects may be determined using case study-based inquiries.
This paper is divided into two components, each worth 125 points:
- Section A: Theoretical concerns that are typical of an applied nature.
- Section B: Case studies.
Both sections necessitate distinct approaches.
Overall, scoring an ethics paper is a game of keywords, self-awareness, and the ability to present oneself as a pragmatic, productive, and committed individual to personal and professional ethics. The examination is of a generalist nature. Until now, the UPSC has asked questions requiring the application of common sense while bearing ethical principles in mind.
Importance of Ethics Paper
Obtaining a high score on the ethics paper is a prerequisite for making the final list and receiving the desired service. Similar to the essay paper, this paper provides the highest returns. With minimal effort, one can earn high grades. Incorporating a moral dimension into answers for GS Papers 1, 2, and 3, as well as the essay, is facilitated by careful preparation for this exam. The personality examination also helps to appear as a person with the qualities desired in a civil servant.
General Instructions for Writing an Ethics Paper
- Know the syllabus: The Syllabus of Ethics is your most essential book and keyword list. Learn the course outline to use the course-specific keywords in your answers.
- Read limited literature: Read them twice before highlighting essential passages. Mark lines and jot down brief remarks.
- Notes: Notes facilitate the organization of keywords in condensed form. This is a MUST, as composing honest answers consists of keyword play.
- Previous Papers: View previous year's documents. Note uncommon search terms such as seven transgressions, Weber, and Rawls's social justice theory. Use these terms in your responses.
- Practice: Reading is less essential than writing answers in Ethics. Know the optimal structure and technique for writing section-A and case study responses.
- Examples: Provide examples from contemporary social issues, professional life, areas of interest, etc. The essence of answer writing consists of examples.
- Diagrams: Draw diagrams in Ethics that are original and inventive. This will provide an advantage over competitors.
Preparation of Ethics Paper
The ETHICS paper assesses "ethical competence," not "knowledge of ethics." Initially, one should become familiar with the terms included in the syllabus. Then, one should be able to express concepts in the most straightforward and fewest words feasible.
- Values: Preferences.
- Ethics: A code of conduct.
- Transparency: Availability of government information to the public.
- Accountability: Holding a person accountable for his or her actions.
- Attitude: An individual's evaluation of another person, idea, situation, etc.
Relate course-specific terms and values to one's own life experiences. For instance, if you are honest, attempt to recall instances where you demonstrated honesty.
Examples & Anecdotes
- Incident 1: During my 10th Standard Board Exams, we were required to compose the antonym of POPULAR. I had typed IMPOPULOUS. An exam monitor informed me the correct response was UNPOPULAR. However, I did not alter my response.
- Incident 2: I once left a hotel without paying the bill by mistake. I returned the following Monday, apologized, and paid.
- Sir M. Visvesvrayya: The then-Dewan of Mysore used a government vehicle to submit his resignation, but returned in his own. He kept two sets of candles—one for official documents and one for private reading.
- Kuvempu: As VC of Mysore University, he instructed a professor to assign even lower grades to his son who had failed an English paper.
- Panna: A judicial employee who substituted her own child for a Rajput prince to save him from a murder plot.
- Sir Abdul Kalam: He personally took his subordinate's children to an exhibition when the engineer forgot due to being immersed in a project.
- Satish Dhawan: Accepted accountability for the SLV launch failure but gave all credit to the crew for the subsequent success.
- Sagayam: An IAS officer who disclosed his and his family's assets on his website.
- K. Jairaj: Investigated the background of a disruptive typist, discovered her depression due to abuse, and reinstated her with compassion.
Additionally, be prepared to use a hypothetical scenario if no real-world examples are available. Always begin with Supposing... Assuming... etc. For example, for a query on 'conflict of interest,' write about an IAS officer on an interview panel uncovering a candidate is a friend's son.
Strategy for Answering Part A - Theoretical Questions
Section A typically consists of 12 to 13 questions worth 10 points each. These should be answered in 150 words (two pages) within seven minutes.
- Introduction: Define keywords or terms mentioned in the query in two to three lines.
- Body: Use points or bullets to address multiple dimensions. Points are more adept at handling dimensions than paragraphs.
- Theory: Theory should account for at most 20% of the response. Overusing keywords renders responses mechanical.
- Examples: Provide at least one or two examples even if the query does not explicitly request them.
- Diagrams: Use original diagrams to break monotony and provide the X-factor.
- Conclusion: Summarise the response in a few lines.
Answer Writing Strategy for Case Studies in Part B
There is never a definitive solution. The objective should be to follow a robust format:
- Actors Involved
- Difficulties / Ethical Dilemmas
- Body of Answer (Analysis of Options)
- Keywords & Theory
- Diagram (Stakeholder map, etc.)
- Conclusion (Practical Solution)
- Pragmatism: Offer specific, practical solutions. Avoid generic statements like "I would promote transparency"; instead, describe how.
- Alternative Listing: Give even the most undesirable course of action as an option (e.g., "accepting a bribe") but always explain why you refuse it.
- Peripheral Issues: Address side-concerns like the offer of a bribe itself, not just the central college irregularity.
- Balance: Strive for the greatest balance between competing options (e.g., allowing current students to finish while prohibiting new enrollments in an errant college).
Recommended Reading
Books & Reports
- The fourth ARC report.
- Selected chapters from the NCERT Psychology textbook for grades XI and XII.
- Citizen-Centric Administration - ARC Report.
- Lexicon for Ethics, Integrity, and Aptitude -- Civil services chronicle.
Biographies and Literature
- "My Experiments with Truth" – Mahatma Gandhi.
- Varghese Kurien's autobiography.
- Swami Vivekananda – Karmayoga and his biography.
- Selected works by Immanuel Kant and Aristotle.